The FTC's sweeping ban on non-competes changes the rules for employers and employees alike. Here's what you need to know.
Find out more about employment law
Excellent
by Connor Beaulieu
Connor is a content strategist, journalist, and legal writer living and working in Chicago. Over the past decade, he'...
Updated on: May 3, 2024 · 6 min read
On April 23, 2024, in a document more than 500 pages long, the Federal Trade Commission announced its final rule banning businesses from issuing non-compete agreements to their workers and overruling existing non-competes. Only a week after it was announced, the rule already faced significant legal challenges from businesses and policymakers alike.
That said, businesses will need to change and adapt in order to avoid hefty penalties—while also protecting their best interests. Employees and contract workers, on the other hand, may enjoy unprecedented freedom to move between employers and clients.
At face value, the FTC's final rule prohibits any business entity from creating or enforcing non-competes, with few exceptions. Understanding that rule starts with a few key pieces of information:
Before anything else, businesses should adjust processes to ensure compliance with the ban. While experts expect the ban to go into effect on August 21, 2024, taking the time now could prevent lawsuits and penalties in the future.
For employees who currently have a non-compete clause as part of their employment contract, businesses do not need to draft new contracts. Instead, the business must provide clear and conspicuous notice that the non-competes are no longer enforceable.
Keep in mind that this may not apply to certain senior executives who can still be bound by traditional non-competes.
Although existing employee agreements won't require changes, it's crucial to adjust any contract templates you intend to use going forward. Attempting to bind a new employee, freelancer, or contractor with a non-compete clause (deliberately or through oversight) opens the door for legal problems.
On top of removing these clauses, however, businesses should also consider adding other clauses that are still permitted or boosting the strength of such clauses already in their employee agreements.
Non-compete clauses have long been one of the best ways to protect a business entity's operating assets, such as proprietary information or client relationships. Now that they're no longer allowed, businesses will need to adapt to stay secure.
Similar in many ways to non-competes, non-disclosure agreements are legally binding contracts that control significant aspects of how employees can share confidential or proprietary information. Typically, these agreements remain in effect even after employment ends and are a crucial way to protect trade secrets, client information, and corporate strategy.
Where non-competes prevent former employees from working for a competitor, non-solicitation agreements simply prevent those employees from "poaching" clients, customers, or other employees.
Essentially, including such an agreement in your employment contract serves as a compromise between an employee's right to work for whomever they want and your right to retain important members of your team and, of course, your clients.
While these should already be a part of your employment contracts, consider leveraging intellectual property agreements more heavily to protect your business' intangible assets. Intellectual property clauses can be used to safeguard any work, patents, copyrights, or other creations produced by a worker during their time with an employer.
One of the best ways to protect yourself from the damage a former employee can cause is by never losing them in the first place. For this, studies have shown time and time again that investing in your employees' development is the key to reducing turnover and inspiring company loyalty.
Even in the event that employees still leave, those who had a positive experience with your company are far less likely to intentionally hurt your business as they go.
Although subject to certain restrictions, garden leave clauses are a powerful option for businesses hoping to limit the damage an ex-employee can cause. These clauses require a terminated employee to stay away from work during their notice period, though they still receive their pay.
While such a clause may not be needed when an employee leaves amicably, it can prevent a disgruntled former employee from accessing sensitive information or resources during their transition period to working with a competitor.
When an employee leaves, it's crucial to understand the reason for their departure. This is where thorough exit interviews shine. Not only can these interviews give you key insights into employee mindset and your own work culture, but they can also help assess whether a departing employee is likely to move to a competitor or share sensitive information.
While the FTC's final rule may mean headaches for business owners, it may offer unprecedented opportunities for certain workers. Specifically, the ban may help with:
Currently, experts believe that the FTC's non-compete ban will take effect sometime in August of this year. Even so, the outpouring of protests and challenges from organizations such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce will likely delay this date for months, if not years.
Throughout these delays, the process allows for a public comment period where business owners and other citizens can express concerns with specific portions of the rule. Additionally, federal procedure is extraordinarily precise with a ruling this broad, and bureaucratic hangups may add to delays.
Still, it's important for business owners to stay ahead of the game where federal regulations are concerned. Those looking to minimize the disruption caused by this ruling may want to adjust processes, contracts, and even company culture in order to mitigate risk. Done correctly, this kind of preparation may even help businesses get ahead of less agile competitors.
At the core of the FTC's ruling is their belief that non-compete agreements are an "unfair method of competition" that wrongly restricts workers in an attempt to increase the business' security and profits. By banning such agreements, the FTC hopes to give workers more freedom and job mobility.
No, the FTC ban will effectively invalidate all existing non-compete agreements except those qualifying for certain exceptions.
While the ban is broad in scope, it does allow exceptions for so-called "senior executives." The FTC defines a senior executive as an individual making a total annual compensation of $151,164 or more who is in a policy-making position within the company.
Additionally, the ban allows an exception for a "bona fide sale," such as the sale of a person's ownership interest in a company.
Experts expect that the FTC's non-compete ban will officially take effect 120 days after its publication in the Federal Register, which is a sort of legal gazette outlining new pieces of legislation and regulations. In this case, this date should be Aug. 21, 2024.
You may also like
Estate planning for small business owners
Did you know most small businesses don't survive the first generation? Not because these businesses aren't sound—it's usually due to failures in estate planning and communication.
March 26, 2024 · 4min read
Starting a Business: A License and Permit Checklist
Use this business checklist to learn about which licenses and permits you may need.
September 16, 2024 · 9min read